Two-stage formation-energy correction (NbZr, TaZr, VZr)
-
Massimiliano Lupo Pasini | Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Description
This bundle contains the scripts, the raw and corrected per-structure data, and the manuscript plots for the NbZr / TaZr / VZr BCC binary formation energies and the associated RMSDs.
Why a two-stage correction is necessary: The "raw" formation energy of every relaxed VASP configuration is computed
in the usual way,
FE_raw(c) = E_alloy(c) - sum_i x_i * E_pure_i ,
where E_pure_i are the per-atom total energies of the pure-element reference
structures (Nb, Ta, V, Zr in the same BCC supercell, with identical INCAR /
KPOINTS / PAW choices). With perfectly consistent reference runs the raw FE
should vanish at the two pure-element endpoints (x = 0 and x = 1) by
construction.
In practice this does not hold for two reasons that are present in our
dataset:
1. Reference-energy inconsistency (composition-dependent bias).
Even with identical input parameters, the pure-element runs (stored in
`corrected_DFT_pure_element_runs/`) differ slightly from the values that
would be implied by the alloy runs at near-pure compositions (a few
meV/atom). This bias is approximately linear in concentration, because
the residual error in E_pure_Nb (or E_pure_Ta / E_pure_V) propagates
into FE_raw(c) as (1 - x) * dE_pure_1, and the corresponding error in
E_pure_Zr propagates as x * dE_pure_2. Left uncorrected, this produces
a non-physical "tilt" of FE_raw(x) and shifts the entire FE-vs-x cloud
away from zero at the endpoints.
2. Endpoint anchoring against the audited true endpoints.
The strict endpoint values (FE_x0_meVatom, FE_x1_meVatom in
`corrected_fe_strict_endpoints_20260518/strict_endpoint_check_20260518.csv`)
were re-derived from an independent cross-check of the pure-element
runs. After stage 1 removes the linear bias, the near-pure compositions
in the alloy dataset still extrapolate to values that differ slightly
from these audited endpoints — because stage 1 is fit from a few
near-end alloy bins, not from the audited pure-element references
themselves.
The README.txt file discusses how these issues are addressed by the two-stage correction, and describes folder layout, pipeline summary, and how to re-run.
Funding Information
DOE Contract Number
AC05-00OR22725Originating Research Organization
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)Sponsoring Organization
Office of Science (SC)Related Works
- IsSupplementTo (DOI): https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.15004330/v1
- Continues (DOI): https://doi.org/10.13139/OLCF/2466323
- Continues (DOI): https://doi.org/10.13139/OLCF/2466324
- Continues (DOI): https://doi.org/10.13139/OLCF/2473294
Details
Release Date
July 2, 2026Subject
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS, 75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND SUPERFLUIDITY, 37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 36 MATERIALS SCIENCEKeywords
Solid Solution Alloys, DFT CalculationDataset
Dataset Type
ND Numeric DataCite This Dataset:
Lupo Pasini, M. (2026). Two-stage formation-energy correction (NbZr, TaZr, VZr). Oak Ridge National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.13139/ORNLNCCS/3366593.
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out [in part] at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.